Jonas Bonér, in "Java Killed the Innovation of Computer Languages," comments on a conversation he had with Chris Richardson, saying that "in general nothing has really happened the last 10 years." He then says that AspectJ is innovative, as well as some scripting languages, but in general, things have remained the same.
He then follows that with a set of questions to think about, for future languages. Interesting stuff.
Now, if only he'd said that "Java killed the Innovation Star..."
Threaded replies
· Jonas Bonér: Java Killed the Innovation of Computer Languages by Joseph Ottinger on Mon Dec 19 09:38:37 EST 2005
· Obviously by James Watson on Mon Dec 19 11:09:05 EST 2005
· doug once said by Erick Reid on Mon Dec 19 14:37:10 EST 2005
· Nothing new? by George Petrov on Thu Dec 22 03:34:44 EST 2005
· Nothing new? by Erick Reid on Thu Dec 29 11:22:56 EST 2005
· rather bizarre blog by Eoin O'Toole on Wed Dec 21 13:17:26 EST 2005
· Snobovians by Channing Benson on Wed Dec 21 16:04:22 EST 2005
· Snobovians by Putio Mudurkin on Thu Dec 22 10:08:33 EST 2005
· I am with this comment by Ahmed Hashim on Mon Jan 02 06:41:04 EST 2006
· Static vs dynamic langs. by Brian Miller on Fri Jan 06 14:57:06 EST 2006
· Templates vs Generics by Erik Engbrecht on Fri Jan 06 11:59:32 EST 2006
· Innovation is not dead by Tony Walker on Thu Dec 22 10:48:52 EST 2005
· Innovation is not dead by James Watson on Thu Dec 22 13:59:35 EST 2005
· Innovation is not dead by Tony Walker on Fri Dec 23 09:50:57 EST 2005
· Innovation is not dead by James Watson on Fri Dec 23 13:33:43 EST 2005
· Innovation is not dead by Tony Walker on Sat Dec 24 11:15:43 EST 2005
· Pragmatic and Innovative by Razvan Terenche on Thu Dec 22 16:29:59 EST 2005
· ya sure by Mathew Thomas on Fri Dec 23 14:33:17 EST 2005
没有评论:
发表评论